Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Please welcome the new "Avaceratops"

It's a happy day when we get to unleash a brand new dinosaur on the world. After 3 years of hard work and a lot of sweat, we get to show off our new primitive centrosaurine ceratopsian!
The newest skeletal, copyright Scott Hartman, used with permission

The skelton in all it's glory, Curator for scale
The bones of the specimen that were recovered, copyright Scott Hartman, used with permission

We discovered the specimen at the end of August 2012 on private land in central Montana. The specimen was found near the top of the Judith River Formation, in rocks approximately 75 million years old. You may notice we are using the name "Avaceratops" in quotes here. We're not trying to be coy or mysterious, but with the stratigraphic difference (our specimen is about 3 million years younger than the holotype) and the differences in skull morphology highlighted below, we have come to the conclusion that this is a different animal than true Avaceratops lammersi.

Someone put a lot of work into this. Tell me who you are so I can give credit!
The skull is quite different in detail. It totally lacks a nose horn, and the long brow horns (until recently a rarity in centrosaurine ceratopsians) point forward and even slightly back towards each other, much different than the other two known skulls. It's large "forehead" area is more reminiscent of the recently described Nasutoceratops, from about the same time in Utah.

Overall, the skeleton is 3.5m long and about 1.2m tall. We estimate the critter was about 3 to 4 years old when it died, both based on its relatively small size and the extensive lack of fusion in its skeletal elements. It's pelvis was reassembled from over 30 separate elements. What a job.
Digging down into the quarry site

After the dinosaur died, it's partially mummified body washed down a stream channel until it hit a logjam composed of not only actual logs, but the limb bones of a large hadrosaur. Here it lodged upside down and then began to partially disarticulate. Some of the dried skin over the hips was surprisingly well preserved though, as addressed in an earlier blog post. A few tyrannosaur teeth were found at the site, but we feel those were incidental background fossils, as no predation or scavenging marks were observed on the bones.

Tyrannosaur tooth found at the site

After all this painstaking work in sometimes miserable conditions, we are excited to share the product of this discovery with the rest of the world. After getting unveiled to the press on Wednesday, September 16 at 10:00am the mounted skeleton will be on display at the RMDRC for just a few weeks before making its first trip to Dallas, TX for the 75th meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. You must come see it!
The mount showing the horn shapes (and absences)

Rear view of skeleton

6 comments:

  1. Hi! Comparison of three Avaceratops skulls is my drawing. http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/rboz_05/36373318.html
    http://blogs.yahoo.co.jp/rboz_05/34762865.html

    This "Avaceratops" is so interesting specimen. I'm looking forward to being described.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Congrats! The mount looks great.
    I sure wish we had ceratopsians from Appalachia, because I have to admit that they are really cool animals.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. +Chase B. We actually have fossil evidence that ceratopsians did live on the Eastern Coast of the United States.
      https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282981394_A_ceratopsian_dinosaur_from_the_Late_Cretaceous_of_eastern_North_America_and_implications_for_dinosaur_biogeography

      Delete
  3. I wonder if this name could work out, "Avaceratops trieboldi".

    ReplyDelete
  4. That's not a choice we as the finders get to make.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh ok. I just thought it was good suggestion since it honored the individual who discovered the species himself, Mike Triebold.

      Delete